A Semantic Approach to Big Data Governance
There is a burgeoning need for a standards-based, semantic approach to data governance. It is responsible for worming semantics technologies from the back offices of organizations to the forefront of some of the most pervasive applications of data and their relevance throughout the entire enterprise today.
Big data and its democratization is responsible for demonstrating to organizations the practical value of semantics by enabling them to maintain and improve governance principles over unruly unstructured and semi-structured data. By demonstrating tangible relationships between data elements that discern meaning, standards-based ontological models, vocabularies, and terminology systems are a vital means of implementing big data governance in a sustainable way.
“Governance depends very heavily on preserving meaning,” TopQuadrant co-founder, CMO and VP of Professional Services Robert Coyne reflected. “In these complex ecosystems of systems, data and people, it’s very difficult to preserve meaning and relate meaning through relationships of things that are in different applications and parts of transactions. What semantic standards offer is an operational way to aid the preservation of meaning.”
Semantic technologies play a pivotal role in a key aspect of governance—denoting common terms and definitions that are either used across business units or across the enterprise itself. Vocabularies enhanced by taxonomies can augment those definitions while filling out a repository of such terms by clarifying their meanings and the numerous points of differentiation in spelling and references for a common definition.
According to Franz CEO Jans Aasman: “For internal compliance and compliance with the government, you really want to use the same words for the same thing. Too many times different departments will use different names for the same things. Far worse, they use the same words for different things.”
Most importantly, the utilization of taxonomies (classifications or principles about terms) can account for the inclusion of unstructured and semi-structured data and still provide a unified, organization-wide meaning to disparate references to terms found in sentiment analysis and other forms of big data. This capability is particularly useful for implementing governance policy in programs started after a particular business process or function, which is what frequently occurs “in the real world,” according to Aasman.
Big Data Modeling
Ontological models provide descriptions of data elements and are able to express the relationships between them in a visual manner that is readily discernible to end users. “The idea is to put the human being in a more powerful context where they’re very well plugged in and informed, and have a rich system that they can navigate,” Coyne commented.
In a standards-based environment, these models provide the basis for an accessible way of managing data governance hallmarks such as metadata, reference data, and business glossary mapping. Due to the granular nature of ontologies, their definitions, and the relationships they illuminate (particularly in semantic graph environments), they facilitate an integration and interoperability between various models that would otherwise not be possible—or consume too much time and resources to implement.
Organizations can integrate all of their various forms of metadata (business, technical, security, governance) with ontological models of virtually any type while still ensuring metadata and semantic consistency. According to Aasman: “Data governance is both about the schema and about the data. When you talk about the schema you actually talk more about the ontological thinking, about structuring your data. But the data is more freeform and the data is something that you can capture with vocabularies and terminology systems and taxonomies.”
Meta Relations and More
“Meta relations is just as important as metadata because the meaning is in the relationships between things,” observed Ralph Hodgson, the TopQuadrant co-founder and executive VP and director of TopBraid Technologies.
In addition to facilitating metadata consistency, ontological models also yield information about the meaning of data through their relationships with other data. Meta relations is defined by Hodgson as “the affiliations between things,” and combines with metadata and vocabularies to provide well governed integration of data between sources and uses. This approach is much more applicable to the rich array of options for managing metadata via governance solutions that incorporate semantic technologies, as opposed to those that don’t.
Using a semantic approach, organizations can relate their metadata to specific business functions. There’s also a degree of self-service imbued by utilizing ontological models for basic governance of metadata, reference data, and other data types. End users are able to link different sets of such data, add attributes and metadata about them at will, and update them simultaneously across different systems. “Ontology models, standards-based, are part of the system; they live in the system. They’re run-time models that can be evolved, queried, and extended,” Coyne remarked.
In addition to the advent of Big Data, one of the key drivers of the contemporary relevance of a semantic approach to big data governance is the onslaught of compliance regulations in numerous industries—particularly finance and health care—in which the governance objectives of “avoiding chaos and reducing risk” noted by Aasman are paramount. Ontologies can directly address compliance issues by creating models based entirely on specific regulations, which can readily integrate with metadata and other facets of compliance based on regulations.
Furthermore, such models can be used to implement a number of critical controls to facilitate compliance. The autonomy granted by the self-service nature of these models is circumscribed by governance solutions that provide sandboxes for immediate trials of changes, prior to an orderly means of implementation according to governance procedures. Additionally, access is both granted and restricted to users according to the roles and responsibilities mandated by governance councils based on instructions directed towards triples, which arguably represent the foundation of semantics. In much the same way, traceability and the provenance of data is also facilitated.
In addition to facilitating internal security via role-based access to data, a standards-based approach to semantics is useful for providing security for external threats as well. When combined with requisite architectures and big data analytics, ontological models can be created to detect the awareness of vulnerabilities. Moreover, organizations can link them to business functions for contingencies. According to Aasman, metadata can also provide insight into security issues.
“You have to look at the metadata of the IP numbers that are trying to invade you,” he said. “What kind of applications are coming at you? What kind of packets? How often is it coming to you? Is this guy related to that guy…The graph database nature of semantic graph databases makes it easier to work with network [security].”
Implementing Big Data Governance
Semantic technologies can greatly abet an organization’s ability to remain consistent in its use of terms and their definitions, metadata, and modeling to achieve goals for regulatory compliance. Moreover, they are essential to determining relationships and ascertaining both context and meaning from them, regardless of different systems. However, they can only augment, and not replace, the foundation of data governance: the roles, responsibilities and rules upon which an enterprise’s data is based.
As Coyne mentioned: “Data governance is growing as a set of practices, and software and systems are an integral part of that. But they’re only a part. What you have at the higher level is communities of practice and policy. Those things are really critical for regulating who is empowered within the organization to make changes.”
About the author: Jelani Harper has written extensively about data management for the past several years. He specializes in semantic technology, big data, and their many different applications.
December 6, 2019
- Scalyr Named as a Representative Vendor in AIOps Platforms by Gartner
- Sapience Analytics 6.5 Draws More Faceted Picture with Workforce Data
- Study: Businesses Recognize Importance of Digital Transformation but Struggle with Limited Resources
- NFL and AWS Partner to Transform Player Health and Safety via Predictive Analytics
- Denodo Platform Now Available on Google Cloud Platform Marketplace
- Pitney Bowes Data Now Available in AWS Data Exchange
December 5, 2019
- MemSQL Announces the General Availability of MemSQL 7.0
- DDN Recognized by IDC as Fastest Growing Supplier of All-Flash Arrays
- Alibaba Cloud Releases Machine Learning Algorithm Platform on Github
- Looker Achieves AWS Retail Competency Status and Amazon Redshift Ready Designation
- Qumulo and iTernity Announce New Partnership at HPE Discover More Munich
- Spectra Logic Announces General Availability of StorCycle
- BigID Announces AWS Security Hub Integration, AWS Marketplace Availability
- Talend Achieves AWS Retail Competency Status
- Snowflake Expands AWS Partnership, Achieves AWS ML, AI Competency Status
- Data Engineering, Data Lake, and Enterprise Data Warehouse Solutions from Informatica Now Available on AWS
- Purdue Announces Plans to Build New Data Science Building
December 4, 2019
- AWS Announces Nine New Compute and Networking Innovations for Amazon EC2
- AWS Announces Contact Lens for Amazon Connect
- AWS Announces Five New Machine Learning Services
Most Read Features
- Deep Learning Has Hit a Wall, Intel’s Rao Says
- Big Data File Formats Demystified
- Will Databricks Build the First Enterprise AI Platform?
- How to Build a Better Machine Learning Pipeline
- Confluent Reveals ksqlDB, a Streaming Database Built on Kafka
- 10 Big Data Trends to Watch in 2019
- Why Every Python Developer Will Love Ray
- Kafka Transforming Into 'Event Streaming Database'
- Hadoop Has Failed Us, Tech Experts Say
- Why Knowledge Graphs Are Foundational to Artificial Intelligence
- More Features…
Most Read News In Brief
- California's New Data Privacy Law Takes Effect in 2020
- Microsoft Aims for Data Analytics Unification with 'Synapse'
- Mobile Coding is a Thing
- Global DataSphere to Hit 175 Zettabytes by 2025, IDC Says
- HPE Acquires MapR
- War Unfolding for Control of Elasticsearch
- Machine Learning Market Demonstrates Solid Growth
- Inside Fortnite's Massive Data Analytics Pipeline
- Intel Debuts New VPU Chip at AI Summit
- Why Gartner Dropped Big Data Off the Hype Curve
- More News In Brief…
Most Read This Just In
- DataCamp Unveils Mobile Coding Courses for Data Science Learning-On-the-Go
- Igneous DataProtect Now Supports Google Cloud Platform Storage
- Informatica Introduces Data Engineering Solution
- Huwei Announces Data infrastructure Strategy and the Open Sourcing of its Data Virtualization Engine HetuEngine
- Striim Announces Incremental Data Capture from Google Cloud Spanner
- Wejo selects Databricks' Analtyics Platform to Help Create a Mobility Data Ecosystem
- Snowflake Launches Private Data Exchange
- TigerGraph Selected to Strengthen Fraud Detection and Credit Risk Assessment
- CockroachDB 19.2 Enables Enterprise to Build Global Applications with Strong Performance
- GridGain and Azul Systems Collaborate to Enable Java for Low-Latency Use Cases at Massive Scale
- More This Just In…
January 26, 2020 - January 28, 2020Austin TX United States